From the category archives:

Video

What’s it for?

by Ian on September 20, 2008

in Music, Personal, Second Life, Video

When I hear people raving excitedly about a new social networking thing, I always go and look, just because I love these things.  I love connecting with other people, and finding things in common.  I just do, and always have.  Recently, though, I’ve started to notice a problem.

When I arrive at a new site, I register as “ids” if I get there first, or “smithi1″ or “idzni” if not.  Then I try and figure out what it is for.  This is where the problem comes in.  Blogging was obvious to me.  Twitter, pretty much so although I initially underestimated the value of it.  Virtual worlds, well… I’d been dying for those to exist since I first started talking about them in 1988 (along with certain other people – who know who they are!)  I understood last.fm pretty quickly, and Facebook and MySpace weren’t very difficult either.

However, the reason that I’m writing this is that I just signed up to blip.fm, and I can’t figure out what it is for.  This is not a unique occurrence, and I am experiencing it more and more often as I explore new and ever more esoteric social networking sites (are the obvious ideas all taken?) .  I mean, blip.fm looks very much as though it was influenced by Twitter, and it’s very obviously about music.  Here are some things that I *have* figured out about it:

  • I can search for a song and “blip” it, and if the site knows about it then I get to enter my thoughts on it into a text box, and then the site plays it to me somehow.  Subsequently, the song appears in my list of blipped songs.
  • I can embed the song, along with my comments, in another web page – presumably I can also do this with anyone’s songs or comments.

  • I can add people as favourites, and get a twitter-like page with the aggregation of all their blipped songs on it.
  • I can press play and start listening to all the songs on any page which works like a sort of playlist.  Presumably the speed of my listening is a lot slower than the content provided by multiple people blipping, so my playback will fall behind.  Or something.
  • It’s almost like I’m a DJ.  Or something.

Perhaps I’m just getting stupider with age, but these individual features don’t seem to me to hang together in a coherent whole.  What I need is an enthusiastic friend who gets it to excitedly tell me about why it’s so great.  They could give me the two or three patterns for using it that illustrate why it’s good.  That approach is very effective for me on those occasions when I am coming to a new thing via an enthusiastic friend, and I quite often do it in the other direction when I’m enthusiastic about something.

Wouldn’t it be great if blip.fm (and the rest) provided the “enthusiastic friend” explanation somewhere.  Perhaps they could put it in the FAQ, as an answer to the question at the top of this post.

“What’s it for?”

Update, 01:20am: From Annie Ok, the one liner I needed: “it’s for posting songs to twitter”.  So you get it to tweet when you blip – that single fact made it all come into focus.  Thanks, Annie!

{ 1 comment }

Machinima screen capture on the Mac

January 22, 2008

I’ve been working on another machinima project.
For over a year now, I’ve been doing these things on and off. I’ve learned a lot, mostly by being incredibly frustrated for extended periods of time.
Throughout all of this time, I have used Snapz Pro X to capture the movie clips from Second Life, or whatever other virtual [...]

Read the full article →

iMovie ‘08

August 30, 2007

It’s been broadly well received, with the very notable and vociferous exception of iMovie ‘08 which has suffered from the severe disapprobation of the commentariat (thanks to Alastair Campbell for that term, by the way). iMovie power users everywhere are up in arms about all the stuff that is missing or different, compared with iMovie ‘06, the previous version.You see, the thing is this. Apple ditched the whole way of thinking and working that underpinned the previous version. Someone at Apple decided, correctly in my opinion, that iMovie ‘06 was too hard to use for your average non-technical user. They decided to change the direction of iMovie to cater for this kind of user – which arguably is who the iLife apps should be targeted at.Apple’s aim, therefore, was to make it very quick and easy to import a movie from your camera and edit it. Having done this, it they wanted it to be very easy to publish the movie so that people can watch it…. There’s more than enough bloat already in the world of software.I expect things like iDVD publishing to be added incrementally over time, as non chargeable updates to iMovie ‘08. I don’t expect to see timelines, timecode, audio track editing and other complicated stuff coming back…. It was too hard for consumers to use, and too limited for the prosumers.For the machinima that I’ve been involved with, I used (read: battled) iMovie ‘06 for a while, but subsequently upgraded to Final Cut Express, and have never looked back.

Read the full article →

Buying HD video cameras…

August 19, 2007

One minute I had this normal life, and the next I was spending hours and hours doing screen capture from Second Life and trying to edit it, and on tight deadlines too!In a considerable hurry, I suddenly had to understand a whole lot of things about video – not least because the Apple video editing products I used (iMovie 6 and later Final Cut Express HD v3.5) only edit video formats…. So I learned about video, and I learned how to edit video.Given all this new experience, plus motivation generated by the imminent advent of the next Smith, I have decided to buy another video camera…. These are the Panasonic HDC-SD1, which records video in AVCHD format to flash memory, and the Canon HV20, which records video in HDV format to tape. They both produce 1080i video, although the Canon has a 24p option that produces 1080p output at 24fps for a more film-like effect.I should say, at this point, that while I’ve looked all over the Internet, the side that has generated the most credibility with me on this whole topic has been camcorderinfo.com…. However, recording to hard disk or flash memory has now become a very practical alternative and the manufacturers are starting to push a new HD format called AVCHD, developed by Sony and Panasonic.AVCHD is much less widely supported in editing tools – iMovie ‘08 and Final Cut Studio 2 support it, but (importantly to me) Final Cut Express doesn’t as yet. To compound the problems, there’s some doubt about AVCHD support on PowerPC Macs – Final Cut Studio definitely doesn’t support it on PowerPC, but I can’t find any hard info about iMovie ‘08. At any rate, such support for AVCHD as exists was introduced following the recent refreshes of Final Cut Studio and iMovie – it’s my uninformed guess that a refresh of Final Cut Express is in the pipeline. For the interim, there’s a $30 tool called Voltaic which will convert the AVCHD into Apple Intermediate Codec for editing in FCE.AVCHD is based on H.264 compression and while it supports bitrates of up to 24Mbps, the HDC-SD1 can only output up to 13Mbps…. As H.264 is a far more modern and advanced compression algorithm, one might expect better results from it, but it turns out that in the comparison done by the folks at camcorderinfo.com, the Canon outperforms the Panasonic on picture quality maybe due to the lower 13Mbps bitrate cap.

Read the full article →